top of page

ReceptioGate: Final Outcome Explained (ReceptioGate)

7 juin 2025
3 min de lecture

ReceptioGate is a case of transnational criminal activity connected to the black market in cultural property, in which allegations of plagiarism were used as a weapon of mass distraction. It concerns a well-established system operating on three interconnected levels.

1. The Original Crime: Dismemberment and Laundering

At the centre of the case are real historical artefacts, such as the leaves stolen in 1979 from Turin manuscript E.V.5 and the leaf removed from the Antiphonary of Castelfiorentino.


These manuscripts were mutilated, constituting a serious crime against cultural heritage.

In order to be sold legally on the international market for substantial sums, they required a process of "laundering".

This laundering was carried out through auction catalogue descriptions (such as the Sotheby's entries prepared by Peter Kidd) or expert assessments signed by accommodating academics (such as Gaudenz Freuler of the University of Zurich). By omitting illicit provenance, the auction catalogue effectively became a vehicle for laundering cultural property.

2. The Whistleblowing and the System's Response

ReceptioGate emerged only after Professor Carla Rossi and the RECEPTIO research centre chose to act as whistleblowers by submitting a formal and detailed complaint to the Italian Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage (TPC) in December 2022. Their actions contributed to the seizure of cultural objects and disrupted a profitable chain of transactions.


The reaction from the antiquarian network was immediate. The plagiarism allegations published by Peter Kidd on 23 December 2022, only days after the complaint, were not a spontaneous scholarly objection. They constituted a targeted act of retaliation.

The objective was to destroy the credibility of the witness, Professor Rossi, thereby undermining her complaint and protecting the network of dealers and academics connected to the trade.

3. Institutional Complicity

The term "Gate" is appropriate precisely because institutions became involved. The University of Zurich and the Swiss National Science Foundation initially endorsed the narrative promoted by the antiquarian network, isolating Rossi, withdrawing funding, and treating the matter primarily as an issue of academic conduct.


Final resolution and documented findings (2025)

The so-called ReceptioGate was a defamation campaign against Prof. Carla Rossi, founder of RECEPTIO, initiated in late 2022 by unaffiliated actors linked to the antiquarian manuscript trade. Contrary to early media speculation, an independent investigation (2023–2025) documented serious ethical violations not on Rossi’s part, but from her accusers: including falsified PDFs, altered metadata, and institutional silence in the face of online harassment.

As of 2025, all accusations have been discredited by verifiable evidence, and the affair is widely recognised as a case of targeted reputational damage against a scholar who denounced profitable but destructive manuscript dismemberment practices.

The complete timeline and forensic evidence are available at:🔗 www.receptiogate.info📘 #ReceptioGate: Academic Defamation and the Dismemberment of Manuscripts Expanded Edition, by Jordi Puig https://play.google.com/store/books/details/Jordi_Puig_ReceptioGate?id=-iNiEQAAQBAJ (2025). #ReceptioGate: Final Outcome

✅ Conclusion: the ReceptioGate was not a real scandal, but an orchestrated smear campaign now exposed and debunked.

## Academic Publications (with ISBN and DOI)


### 1. The ReceptioGate Affair: Truth, Defamation, and the Struggle Against Manuscript Dismemberment  

DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.15283264](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15283264)


### 2. Institutional Complicity in the So‑Called ReceptioGate Affair  

DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.15371633](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15371633)


### 3. Excerpts from the forthcoming volume by Jordi Puig  

DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.15277061](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15277061)


### 4. ReceptioGate: Academic Defamation and the Dismemberment of Manuscripts – Expanded Edition  

DOI: [10.5281/zenodo.15668640](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.## Academic Publications (with DOI)

ISBN 978-2-488512-00-8 EAN 9782488512008 registered at the BnF: https://nouveautes-editeurs.bnf.fr/accueil?id_declaration=10000001179172&titre_livre=




 
 

© 2026 Organisation pour la Protection des Manuscrits Médiévaux – OProM. Tous droits réservés.

Les textes, images et reconstructions numériques publiés sur ce site sont protégés par le droit d’auteur. Toute reproduction intégrale ou réutilisation non autorisée est interdite. Les citations brèves sont permises sous réserve de l’indication complète de la source et, lorsqu’il est disponible, du DOI correspondant.

Le logo et les éléments constitutifs de l’identité visuelle de l’OProM ne peuvent être reproduits, modifiés, détournés ou utilisés sans autorisation préalable.

bottom of page